Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vetrano, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vetrano, A.
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol 38, Issue 2, 222-223
Copyright © 1981 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Update on the Lannett and Pharmadyne decisions

AJ Vetrano


The implications of litigation concerning the authority of FDA in premarket approval of drugs are discussed. Since a recent paper on the Lannett and Pharmadyne decisions, several related court cases have been tried. The principal case discussed in Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc. v. U.S., where the FDA's authority to require premarket approval of "me-too" drugs was temporarily thrown into jeopardy by a district court's decision involving Premo's Insulase brand of chlorpropamide tablets. However, an appeal, the decision was reversed and the case dismissed. The courts' opinions for these decisions are discussed, as well as related developments.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement